SOMA Risk Studio  ·  Weblink dashboard sample ← Back to Resources  ·  riskstudio.somaprojectcontrols.com
This is a demonstration sample with fabricated data. Real Risk Studio Weblink dashboards are generated per scheme per period from live Safran exports and the validated risk register. Request a real walkthrough at hello@somaprojectcontrols.com.
M3 Post-mit · P80
03 Jan 2028
+114 days from deterministic
M3 · P50
18 Oct 2027
+36 days from deterministic
M3 · P90
25 Feb 2028
+167 days from deterministic
Deterministic
12 Sep 2027
Submitted baseline
SOMA Readiness
76 / 100
Amber · Caveats
DCMA 14-point
11 / 14
3 checks failing
Section 01

Schedule risk profile

S-curve · post-mitigation primary M3 Post-mitigation lifts the P80 by 49 days versus the un-mitigated M2 case, and the P10–P90 corridor narrows from 198 days to 142 days — the residual risk is mostly tail, not central spread.

Schedule risk S-curve, M1 DU-Only · M2 Threats Pre-mit · M3 Threats Post-mit Three cumulative distribution functions plotted from May 2027 to May 2028. M3 reaches P50 on 18 Oct 2027, P80 on 03 Jan 2028, P90 on 25 Feb 2028. P10 to P90 corridor shaded in teal under the M3 curve. Deterministic completion 12 Sep 2027 marked as a vertical reference line. 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% May 27 Aug 27 Nov 27 Feb 28 May 28 P10–P90 range Deterministic 12 Sep 27 P50 · 18 Oct 27 P80 · 03 Jan 28 P90 · 25 Feb 28 M1 · DU-Only M2 · Threats Pre-mit M3 · Threats Post-mit (primary) Completion date (10 000 iterations · NORTA · Higham PSD corrected)

M1 · DU-Only

P50 27 Sep 27 · P80 14 Dec 27 · P90 04 Feb 28

Duration uncertainty only — no risk register applied.

M2 · Threats Pre-mit

P50 12 Nov 27 · P80 22 Feb 28 · P90 18 Apr 28

DU + un-mitigated threat exposures.

M3 · Post-mit (primary)

P50 18 Oct 27 · P80 03 Jan 28 · P90 25 Feb 28

Mitigation actions applied — the headline post-mit position.

Section 02

Top risk drivers

Tornado · Spearman rank correlation, M3 post-mit Statutory undertaker delays drive 18.4 days of mean P80 impact — three times the magnitude of the fifth-ranked driver and the single biggest residual contributor after mitigation.

Top risk drivers tornado — top 8 risks by mean P80 schedule impact in days Eight named risks ranked by mean P80 impact. Statutory undertaker delays 18.4 days, Ground conditions 12.7 days, Land acquisition 9.3 days, Buildability earthworks 7.1 days, Weather contingency 5.6 days, Design coordination 4.2 days, Permits and consents 3.4 days, Plant availability 2.1 days. Mean schedule impact (days) R-014 — Statutory undertaker delays 18.4d R-008 — Ground conditions M42 western emb. 12.7d R-003 — Land acquisition — 4 plots 9.3d R-021 — Buildability — earthworks Q3 7.1d R-005 — Weather contingency winter 26–27 5.6d R-012 — Design coordination — utilities 4.2d R-007 — Permits & consents — section 50 3.4d R-019 — Plant availability — paver 2.1d O-002 — Acceleration — supply chain pull-fwd −4.6d 0d 20d
Section 03

Activity drivers

Tornado · activity-level rank correlation The driver activities cluster on the western embankment and the northbound slip approach — six of the top ten activity drivers sit on the same critical path segment, so a single ground-conditions event would cascade.

Activity drivers tornado — top 8 critical-path activities by P80 schedule sensitivity Eight activities ranked by Spearman rank correlation with project finish at P80. Western embankment grading at 0.62, NB slip foundations at 0.58, southern bridge deck pour at 0.51, signal gantry erection at 0.44, drainage main relay at 0.39, kerbing and lining package C at 0.31, surfacing southbound binder at 0.27, sign portal installation at 0.21. Spearman rank correlation with project finish (P80) A1140 — Western embankment grading 0.62 A1220 — NB slip — foundations 0.58 A1380 — Southern bridge deck pour 0.51 A1460 — Signal gantry erection 0.44 A1080 — Drainage main relay 0.39 A1530 — Kerbing & lining package C 0.31 A1640 — Surfacing SB — binder course 0.27 A1710 — Sign portal installation 0.21 0.0 0.35 0.70 Higher rank correlation = activity finish date co-moves more tightly with project finish under random sampling.
Section 04

Mitigation delta

Pre vs post mitigation · P80 comparison Mitigation has trimmed 49 days off the P80 — the planned action set on R-014 (Statutory undertaker delays) and R-008 (Ground conditions) accounts for 36 of those 49 days alone.

M2 · Threats Pre-mitigation
22 Feb 2028
P80 · 163 days from deterministic
Top 3 un-mitigated drivers: R-014 Statutory undertaker delays (28.7d), R-008 Ground conditions (19.4d), R-003 Land acquisition (14.1d).
M3 · Threats Post-mitigation
03 Jan 2028
P80 · 114 days from deterministic
↓ 49 days saved
Residual drivers (post-mit): R-014 (18.4d), R-008 (12.7d), R-003 (9.3d) — same top three, but rank order unchanged.
Mitigation delta — days to P80 from deterministic, M2 versus M3 Horizontal bars showing M2 Pre-mitigation P80 at 163 days from deterministic and M3 Post-mitigation P80 at 114 days from deterministic. Delta is a 49-day saving. Days to P80 from deterministic completion (12 Sep 2027) M2 Pre-mit 163d M3 Post-mit 114d Mitigation delta −49d 30% reduction 0d 75d 150d 200d
Section 05

Duration uncertainty (DU) bands

DU band distribution · 138 risk-loadable activities The DU profile leans Band C — 64 activities (46%) sit in the moderate band, which is consistent with a Stage 4 design maturity, but the 12 Band A activities account for 71% of the M1 P80 spread.

Band A 12 activities (9%) · highly uncertain Band B 37 activities (27%) · uncertain Band C 64 activities (46%) · moderate Band D 25 activities (18%) · low uncertainty
Duration uncertainty band distribution — count of activities per band Four band columns. Band A 12 activities, Band B 37, Band C 64, Band D 25. Total 138 risk-loadable activities. Activity count by DU band 12 Band A −25% / +40% 37 Band B −15% / +35% 64 Band C −10% / +15% 25 Band D −3% / +5%
Band reference table (AACE 41R-08 informed)
BandDescriptionRange (min / max)Distribution
AHighly uncertain−25% / +40%Triangular
BUncertain−15% / +35%Triangular
CModerate−10% / +15%BetaPERT
DLow uncertainty−3% / +5%BetaPERT
Section 06

Findings

SOMA QSRA Readiness V2.6 · 33 checks · 5 domains Eight findings open. Three are blockers — two DCMA leads/lags violations and one out-of-sequence cluster on the western embankment — and need closure before the next client stage gate.

ID Severity Finding Owner Status
DCMA-04 Blocker Negative leads detected on 6 relationships — A1140→A1160 (SS−5), A1220→A1240 (FS−10) and four others. Negative leads compress the critical path artificially and breach the SOMA QSRA Readiness check S3-C2. Planner — A. Hughes Open
DCMA-05 Blocker High lag count — 14 relationships use FS lag > 10 days. Threshold is 5% of total; observed 8.6%. Recommend converting to driving activities or splitting work. Planner — A. Hughes Open
SOMA-S4-C3 Blocker Out-of-sequence progress — 4 activities show actual start before predecessor finish on the western embankment cluster (A1080, A1100, A1120, A1140). Risk modelling integrity is compromised until resolved. Risk Manager — D. Patel Open
DCMA-08 Warning High duration count — 31 activities have durations > 44 working days. Threshold 5%; observed 7.2%. Consider splitting long-running activities to expose progress signal. Planner — A. Hughes Open
SOMA-S5-R1 Warning Three-point estimate sanity — R-019 (Plant availability) has min 5d / most-likely 5d / max 9d. Most-likely equals min — flag for re-estimation. RAM — J. Sinclair Open
SOMA-S5-R2 Warning Probability boundary — R-022 (Late piling delivery) probability 100%. Risks at 0 or 100% should be moved to the schedule baseline, not modelled as probabilistic events. RAM — J. Sinclair Open
SOMA-S2-C1 Info Correlation matrix non-PSD — original matrix had two negative eigenvalues, Higham nearest-PSD correction applied (max delta 0.07 in pairs (R-005, R-008) and (R-008, R-014)). Documented in audit log; no action required if accepted. Risk Manager — D. Patel Accepted
SOMA-S1-D3 Info DU sample size — Band A holds 12 activities. Below the V2.6 advisory floor of 15 for monotone stability of the P80; consider re-banding two adjacent Band B activities. Planner — A. Hughes Accepted

Three accepted findings (with reasons logged) are travelling with this report. The full audit trail — including HMAC-chained log entries and per-run hashes — is available on the live tool.

Section 07

Per-decile risk attribution

Per-decile risk re-ranking · M3 post-mit The P10 leaders differ from the P80 leaders — the rare, large risks (R-014 Statutory undertaker, R-008 Ground conditions) dominate the upper deciles, while the high-probability bulk-firing risks (R-005 Weather, R-019 Plant) carry the lower deciles.

Risks are re-ranked per decile using decile_factor(d) = 0.4 + 1.2 × (d / 9) — model-based, not iteration-direct (Safran iteration export doesn't preserve per-iteration risk firing; the decile weighting is the defensible approximation). Methodology stamp V2.6.

P10 leaders (low-realisation tail)
RankRiskDecile weightAdjusted impact
1R-005 — Weather contingency winter 26–270.533.0d
2R-019 — Plant availability — paver0.531.1d
3R-007 — Permits & consents — section 500.531.8d
4R-012 — Design coordination — utilities0.532.2d
5R-014 — Statutory undertaker delays0.539.8d
P50 leaders (median)
RankRiskDecile weightAdjusted impact
1R-014 — Statutory undertaker delays1.0018.4d
2R-008 — Ground conditions M42 western emb.1.0012.7d
3R-003 — Land acquisition — 4 plots1.009.3d
4R-021 — Buildability — earthworks Q31.007.1d
5R-005 — Weather contingency winter 26–271.005.6d
P80 leaders (upper-tail commitment band)
RankRiskDecile weightAdjusted impact
1R-014 — Statutory undertaker delays1.4025.8d
2R-008 — Ground conditions M42 western emb.1.4017.8d
3R-003 — Land acquisition — 4 plots1.4013.0d
4R-021 — Buildability — earthworks Q31.409.9d
5R-012 — Design coordination — utilities1.405.9d
P90 leaders (worst-case decile)
RankRiskDecile weightAdjusted impact
1R-014 — Statutory undertaker delays1.6029.4d
2R-008 — Ground conditions M42 western emb.1.6020.3d
3R-003 — Land acquisition — 4 plots1.6014.9d
4R-021 — Buildability — earthworks Q31.6011.4d
5R-008-A — Latent contamination tail event1.609.6d